The main objective of the very first human beings was to survive, or
rather to ensure the survival of the species. They were driven by their
animal instincts: to eat, to sleep, and to procreate at all costs. When
our ancestors began to gather in tribes, then in villages, this
aggressive, individualistic way of living no longer worked. You don’t
steal food or women from your friends.
So that the community could
develop, each individual had to play their part: their new incentives
became obtaining rewards and avoiding punishment, according to a model
that is known today as “the carrot-and-stick”.
As man evolved, so
did the factors that motivated him, sometimes to an almost imperceptible
degree. Since the last century, the complication of our financial
structure has brought with it the demand for services that are
increasingly difficult to perform, and, consequently, the factors that
motivate people have changed dramatically. Professors and researchers
such as Abraham Maslow, Douglas McGregor and Frederick Herzberg, all
tried to guess the most effective way to encourage new generations to
improve. Companies followed their studies and began to apply them to
working practices: more recognition, increased autonomy and
opportunities for growth became the new criteria for the management of
human resources in a business. This is what we might call a 2.1
motivational model.
However, every paradigm has an expiration date and the time has come to renew our much loved 2.1.