We are in 2011, and the word “gig economy” is being used more frequently in the business world and especially, in the world of technology. The concept of “gig economy”, means temporary job/task, and is becoming more and more popular.
The first materializations of this new model are e-commerce websites offering workforce. A company can search for the ideal candidate for a specific project, selecting them among thousands of profiles. Just one person for one particular project, without establishing any sort of relationship. No strings attached.
Quickly, the idea expands to small jobs such as deliveries, dog sitters, etc. A worker receives a phone notification as soon as a task is available and can choose to accept or reject it. An additional approach for this type of work is represented by the division of projects into very small tasks, distributed among dozens or hundreds of different people. Projects such as cataloguing images, describing products or answering frequent questions. Each job requires very little time and people are paid peanuts.
It is said that this new paradigm reinvented the business world, eliminating the idea of a “permanent” and fixed job, allowing everybody to choose when and where to work. There is no boss or fixed schedule anymore. We are our own managers. These ideas adapt perfectly to a well-known demographic group, the people born between 1980 and 2000, millennials. A generation that, thanks to the new technologies, for the first time ever, can have different priorities at work, such as flexibility and personal satisfaction. It is a generation that is used to having everything on a smartphone: content, multimedia, shopping and services.
However, along with all of these advantages, the gig economy also brings problems: ranging from the lack of job stability to little protection of workers’ rights.
It seems to be a brilliant and innovative strategy, but it’s in fact an updated version of temporary work, which had been made popular in past decades. In short, it is an opportunity for companies to have employees, without calling them employees, thus avoiding the responsibilities of an employer.